
Radeon R9 270X
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 270X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅70.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 270X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 270X is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌0.5% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
Radeon R9 270X
2013Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅70.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 270X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 270X is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌0.5% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H better than Radeon R9 270X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 270X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 270X and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

Radeon R9 270X
Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 270X scores 4,874 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H reaches 4,852 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Raw compute: 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,874 | 4,852 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 3840+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.688 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+502% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 2105 MHz+100% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 240+200% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 768 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 270X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 270X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270X) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 270X draws 180W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The Radeon R9 270X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 270X) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-28% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 109mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 27.1+40% | 19.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 270X launched at $199 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H launched at $200. The Radeon R9 270X costs 0.5% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.5 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 24.3 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 0.8% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.5 | 24.3 |
| Codename | Curacao | Navi 21 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #448 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












