Radeon R9 255 vs FirePro V8700

AMD

Radeon R9 255

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS

FirePro V8700

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

1501

G3D Mark Score

1539

Performance Difference

FirePro V8700 is 2.5% faster than Radeon R9 255

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Radeon R9 2552048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 1,501 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

FirePro V8700N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, FirePro V8700 performs 2.5% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Radeon R9 255 and FirePro V8700.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Radeon R9 255 and FirePro V8700

AMD

Radeon R9 255

The Radeon R9 255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. Core clock: 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,501 points. Launch price was $249.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:112
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:448 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:918 MHz
Shading Units:1792
Transistor Count:5,000 million
Texture Fill Rate:102.8
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):190 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.29 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Tonga
Architecture:GCN 3.0 (2014βˆ’2019)
Launch Price:$249
Release Date:September 2 2014
Performance Ranking Position:365

FirePro V8700

The FirePro V8700 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. Core clock: 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,539 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:null
L1 Cache:320 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:725 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:2,640 million
Texture Fill Rate:58.00
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):151 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.856 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Cayman
Architecture:TeraScale 3 (2010βˆ’2013)
Release Date:May 24 2011
Performance Ranking Position:656

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 255 and FirePro V8700