
Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 9100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 527.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 230W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌530.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 230W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 527.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 230W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌530.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 230W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 9100 better than Intel Arc Pro B50?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro B50 make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 9100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 138 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B50 and Radeon Pro WX 9100

Intel Arc Pro B50
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro WX 9100
Radeon Pro WX 9100
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,250 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 and the Radeon Pro WX 9100 reaches 12,250 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,208 | 12,250 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.65 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS+15% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+73% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 128 | 256+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro B50 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 9100).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro WX 9100's 230W — a 106.7% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-70% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 267mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 174.4+227% | 53.3 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 launched at $2199. The Intel Arc Pro B50 costs 84.1% less ($1850 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 5.6 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 525% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-84% | $2199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.0+525% | 5.6 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Vega 10 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | July 10 2017 |
| Ranking | #221 | #219 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













