
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 9100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+15.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 626% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,250 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌530.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅+15.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 626% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,250 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌530.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon Pro WX 9100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 9100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 138 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro WX 9100

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro WX 9100
Radeon Pro WX 9100
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,250 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon Pro WX 9100's 12,250 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 15.2%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+15% | 12,250 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 4096+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS+91% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+12% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 256+113% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+90% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 9100) — the Radeon Pro WX 9100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 9100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro WX 9100's 230W — a 35.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-30% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+65% | 53.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 launched at $2199. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 84.1% less ($1850 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 5.6 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 621.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-84% | $2199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+621% | 5.6 |
| Codename | TU106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | July 10 2017 |
| Ranking | #168 | #219 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













