
GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID RTX6000-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌530.5% HIGHER MSRP$6,299 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,300 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 530.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID RTX6000-1Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID RTX6000-1Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GRID RTX6000-1Q
2015Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,300 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 530.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID RTX6000-1Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID RTX6000-1Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌530.5% HIGHER MSRP$6,299 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID RTX6000-1Q better than Radeon Pro WX 8200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro WX 8200 make more sense than GRID RTX6000-1Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 568 FPS | 568 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 142 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-1Q and Radeon Pro WX 8200

GRID RTX6000-1Q
GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-1Q scores 12,617 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,617 | 12,615 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3584+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS+123% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1500 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 224+75% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 896 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GRID RTX6000-1Q gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 2.2% difference. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-2% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.1+2% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 costs 84.1% less ($5300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers 530% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6299 | $999-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 12.6+530% |
| Codename | GM204 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #525 | #210 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













