
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 298.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 230W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌301.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 230W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 298.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 230W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌301.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 230W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 8200 better than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 8GB make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 8200?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 568 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 142 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Radeon Pro WX 8200

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535 | 12,615 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+18% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 224+180% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+184% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 55.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-43% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-18% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+76% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 75.1% less ($750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 299.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-75% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.3+299% | 12.6 |
| Codename | GA106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #211 | #210 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













