
Radeon AI PRO R9700
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($1,299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 102.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.
Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅23.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌92.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$1,299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($1,299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 102.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅23.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.
Trade-offs
- ❌92.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$1,299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon AI PRO R9700 better than Radeon PRO W7800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W7800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 151 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 911 FPS | 918 FPS |
| medium | 755 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 676 FPS |
| ultra | 574 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 701 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 576 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 348 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 291 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 881 FPS |
| medium | 706 FPS | 732 FPS |
| high | 636 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 558 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 639 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 445 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 376 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon AI PRO R9700 and Radeon PRO W7800

Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon AI PRO R9700 scores 28,589 versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 27,180 — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 leads by 5.2%. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 64 RT cores (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800) with 128 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,589+5% | 27,180 |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 4480+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS+6% | 45.25 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+16% | 2525 MHz |
| ROPs | 128 | 128 |
| TMUs | 256 | 280+9% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+33% | 6 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 64 | 70+9% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 32 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+33% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: VCN 5.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 5.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 5.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 draws 300W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 260W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.3 | 104.5+10% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 costs 48% less ($1200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 101.8% better value. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1299-48% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0+102% | 10.9 |
| Codename | Navi 48 | Navi 31 |
| Release | July 23 2025 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #23 | #28 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












