G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅22.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 110.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
❌11.1% longer card at 240mm vs 216mm.

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
✅Measures 216mm instead of 240mm, a 24mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
43.5% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅22.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 110.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
✅Measures 216mm instead of 240mm, a 24mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
❌11.1% longer card at 240mm vs 216mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
43.5% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon PRO W7500?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 22.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 47% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 47.0% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 6nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 is about $130 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $429 MSRP, and you are getting 22.6% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 47.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 110.9%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon PRO W7500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7500 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $429 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7500 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	167 FPS	136 FPS
medium	152 FPS	119 FPS
high	134 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	85 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	122 FPS
medium	114 FPS	101 FPS
high	99 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	66 FPS
medium	74 FPS	58 FPS
high	62 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	34 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7500

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	392 FPS	339 FPS
medium	334 FPS	284 FPS
high	268 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	174 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	212 FPS
medium	209 FPS	179 FPS
high	169 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	99 FPS
medium	98 FPS	83 FPS
high	82 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7500

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	812 FPS	598 FPS
medium	642 FPS	479 FPS
high	551 FPS	399 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	414 FPS
medium	443 FPS	356 FPS
high	379 FPS	291 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	299 FPS
medium	297 FPS	239 FPS
high	234 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	141 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7500

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	746 FPS	522 FPS
medium	613 FPS	453 FPS
high	536 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	425 FPS
medium	486 FPS	359 FPS
high	421 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	267 FPS
medium	308 FPS	239 FPS
high	285 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	150 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7500

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon PRO W7500

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 13,298 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 47%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1700 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W7500) with 96 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7500
G3D Mark Score	19,548+47%	13,298
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	3072+71%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+24%	12.19 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+45%	1700 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	96	112+17%
L1 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24	28+17%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7500
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7500
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7500
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7500
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 48.6% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7500
TDP	115W	70W-39%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	216mm
Height	111mm	115mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	73°C-3%	75°C
Perf/Watt	170.0	190.0+12%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 30.3% less ($130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 111% better value.