
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 62.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
- ❌12% longer card at 242mm vs 216mm.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅10.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 242mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌72.3% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 62.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅10.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 242mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
- ❌12% longer card at 242mm vs 216mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌72.3% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7500 better than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 8GB make more sense than Radeon PRO W7500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 150 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Radeon PRO W7500

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 13,298 — the Radeon PRO W7500 leads by 6.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1700 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W7500) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535 | 13,298+6% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS | 12.19 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+5% | 1700 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 60% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 70W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 216mm |
| Height | 112mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-12% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4 | 190.0+97% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 42% less ($180 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 62.3% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-42% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.3+62% | 31.0 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #211 | #192 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













