
Radeon PRO W6600X
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅5.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌62.9% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 120W vs 70W.
- ❌11.6% longer card at 241mm vs 216mm.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 120W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 241mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600X across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅5.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 120W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 241mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌62.9% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 120W vs 70W.
- ❌11.6% longer card at 241mm vs 216mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600X across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7500 better than Radeon PRO W6600X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W6600X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6600X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6600X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6600X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 393 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 443 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6600X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 393 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 443 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 150 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6600X and Radeon PRO W7500

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6600X scores 13,113 and the Radeon PRO W7500 reaches 13,298 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600X is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 2479 MHz vs 1700 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6600X) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,113 | 13,298+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.15 TFLOPS | 12.19 TFLOPS+20% |
| Boost Clock | 2479 MHz+46% | 1700 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+14% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6600X draws 120W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 52.6% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 70W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 216mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 109.3 | 190.0+74% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. The Radeon PRO W7500 costs 38.6% less ($270 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon PRO W7500 offers 64.9% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $429-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.8 | 31.0+65% |
| Codename | Navi 23 | Navi 33 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #197 | #192 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













