
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 168.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅16.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌180.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 168.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅16.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌180.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6600X better than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 8GB make more sense than Radeon PRO W6600X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Radeon PRO W6600X

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 and the Radeon PRO W6600X reaches 13,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2479 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 32 (Radeon PRO W6600X) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535 | 13,113+5% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS | 10.15 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2479 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 32+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 8% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 120W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-12% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4 | 109.3+13% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 64.4% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 167.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-64% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.3+168% | 18.8 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 23 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #211 | #197 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













