
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅115.0% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 81.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌420% higher power demand at 130W vs 25W.
Radeon PRO W6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 130W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Radeon PRO W6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅115.0% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 81.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 130W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌420% higher power demand at 130W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 8GB better than Radeon PRO W6300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W6300 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 21 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 49 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Radeon PRO W6300

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 5,560 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 125.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2040 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12 (Radeon PRO W6300) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+125% | 5,560 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+233% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+190% | 3.133 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2040 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+900% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+67% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6300 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 135.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 25W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4 | 222.4+131% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200. The Radeon PRO W6300 costs 19.7% less ($49 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 80.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $200-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.3+81% | 27.8 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 24 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #211 | #413 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













