
Radeon Pro Vega II
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 8060S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega II
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌339.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 32.0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌763.6% higher power demand at 475W vs 55W.
Radeon RX 8060S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,699 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 351.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 475W, a 420W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro Vega II
2019Radeon RX 8060S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,699 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 351.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 475W, a 420W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌339.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 32.0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌763.6% higher power demand at 475W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 8060S better than Radeon Pro Vega II?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega II still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 687 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 520 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 45 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega II and Radeon RX 8060S

Radeon Pro Vega II
Radeon Pro Vega II
The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.

Radeon RX 8060S
Radeon RX 8060S
The Radeon RX 8060S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 40 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega II scores 15,597 and the Radeon RX 8060S reaches 16,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega II is built on GCN 5.1 while the Radeon RX 8060S uses RDNA 3.5. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 40 (Radeon RX 8060S). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,597 | 16,000+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Shading Units | 4096+10140% | 40 |
| Boost Clock | 1720 MHz | 2900 MHz+69% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 8060S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega II lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 256 GB/s (Max) (Radeon RX 8060S) — a 237.5% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II. Bus width: 384-bit vs System Shared.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | none |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | LPDDR5X (Shared) |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+238% | 256 GB/s (Max) |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | System Shared |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 8060S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon RX 8060S). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 8060S).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega II draws 475W versus the Radeon RX 8060S's 55W — a 158.5% difference. The Radeon RX 8060S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 650W (Radeon RX 8060S). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 4 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 475W | 55W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 120mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 4 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 32.8 | 290.9+787% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega II launched at $2199 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 8060S launched at $500. The Radeon RX 8060S costs 77.3% less ($1699 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 32.0 (Radeon RX 8060S) — the Radeon RX 8060S offers 350.7% better value. The Radeon RX 8060S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2199 | $500-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.1 | 32.0+351% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | — |
| Release | June 3 2019 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #138 | #117 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













