G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14,114 vs 15,633).
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅+10.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+10.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14,114 vs 15,633).
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU better than GeForce RTX 2060?

Yes. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 10.8% higher PassMark G3D performance and 32 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2018 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $349 MSRP, and you are getting 10.8% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 2060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 2060 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

When does GeForce RTX 2060 make more sense than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (160W vs 300W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $349 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU currently gives you 10.8% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 2060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	108 FPS	211 FPS
medium	98 FPS	191 FPS
high	82 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	183 FPS
medium	83 FPS	158 FPS
high	69 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	76 FPS
medium	43 FPS	66 FPS
high	31 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	290 FPS	301 FPS
medium	247 FPS	255 FPS
high	197 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	158 FPS
1440p
low	192 FPS	203 FPS
medium	164 FPS	172 FPS
high	131 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	99 FPS
medium	91 FPS	82 FPS
high	75 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	635 FPS	703 FPS
medium	508 FPS	563 FPS
high	423 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	352 FPS
1440p
low	476 FPS	528 FPS
medium	381 FPS	422 FPS
high	318 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	264 FPS
4K
low	318 FPS	352 FPS
medium	254 FPS	281 FPS
high	212 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	176 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	428 FPS	321 FPS
medium	354 FPS	279 FPS
high	286 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	357 FPS	237 FPS
medium	302 FPS	212 FPS
high	235 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	142 FPS
medium	166 FPS	125 FPS
high	154 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	78 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 15,633 — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU leads by 10.8%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	14,114	15,633+11%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1920	3584 ×2+87%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.451 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS ×2+67%
Boost Clock	1680 MHz+12%	1500 MHz
ROPs	48	64 ×2+33%
TMUs	120	224 ×2+87%
L1 Cache	1.9 MB+116%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB	4 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 433.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	32 GB+433%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	4 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Turing)	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
TDP	160W-47%	300W
Recommended PSU	500W-23%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	113mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	72-4%	75°C
Perf/Watt	88.2+69%	52.1