
GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID RTX6000-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1159.8% HIGHER MSRP$6,299 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,799 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1142.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID RTX6000-1Q
2015Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,799 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1142.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1159.8% HIGHER MSRP$6,299 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID RTX6000-1Q better than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5700 XT make more sense than GRID RTX6000-1Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 64 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 568 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 140 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 217 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-1Q and Radeon Pro 5700 XT

GRID RTX6000-1Q
GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-1Q scores 12,617 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,617+1% | 12,442 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 7.675 TFLOPS+59% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1499 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 160+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GRID RTX6000-1Q gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID RTX6000-1Q comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 53.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 130W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.1 | 95.7+71% |
Value Analysis
The GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT costs 92.1% less ($5799 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 24.9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 1145% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6299 | $500-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 24.9+1145% |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #525 | #215 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













