Radeon 760M vs Radeon Pro 5300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro 5300M better than Radeon 760M?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,449 vs 5,853 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro 5300M is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 4nm process instead of 7nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro 5300M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Radeon Pro 5300M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro 5300M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 7.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 760M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 85W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 760M make more sense than Radeon Pro 5300M?

Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 85W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro 5300M. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro 5300M currently gives you 7.4% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 5300M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	46 FPS	77 FPS
medium	29 FPS	67 FPS
high	21 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	35 FPS
1440p
low	32 FPS	69 FPS
medium	19 FPS	60 FPS
high	11 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	12 FPS	25 FPS
medium	8 FPS	24 FPS
high	5 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	13 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open Radeon Pro 5300M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	91 FPS	117 FPS
medium	64 FPS	82 FPS
high	44 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	37 FPS
1440p
low	58 FPS	78 FPS
medium	38 FPS	47 FPS
high	29 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	25 FPS
4K
low	30 FPS	37 FPS
medium	21 FPS	25 FPS
high	17 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	14 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open Radeon Pro 5300M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	245 FPS	263 FPS
medium	196 FPS	211 FPS
high	163 FPS	176 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	132 FPS
1440p
low	184 FPS	198 FPS
medium	147 FPS	158 FPS
high	123 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	99 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	132 FPS
medium	98 FPS	105 FPS
high	77 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	62 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open Radeon Pro 5300M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	154 FPS	141 FPS
medium	120 FPS	113 FPS
high	103 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	80 FPS
1440p
low	109 FPS	103 FPS
medium	87 FPS	85 FPS
high	74 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	59 FPS
4K
low	65 FPS	59 FPS
medium	52 FPS	47 FPS
high	42 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	29 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open Radeon Pro 5300M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and Radeon Pro 5300M

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 760M scores 5,449 versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 5,853 — the Radeon Pro 5300M leads by 7.4%. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro 5300M
G3D Mark Score	5,449	5,853+7%
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	4 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	512	1280+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.323 TFLOPS+66%	3.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2599 MHz+108%	1250 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro 5300M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro 5300M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro 5300M
DirectX	12 (12_2)	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M).

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro 5300M
Encoder	VCN 4.0	VCN 2.0
Decoder	VCN 4.0	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 140% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.