Radeon HD 5750 vs Radeon R9 M265X

AMD

Radeon HD 5750

2009Core: 700 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M265X

2014Core: 575 MHzBoost: 625 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon HD 5750

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $70 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 54.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Radeon R9 M265X

2014

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 53.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon HD 5750 better than Radeon R9 M265X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 1,169 vs 1,167 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon HD 5750 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 5750 is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon HD 5750 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $130 MSRP. Radeon HD 5750 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon HD 5750 is about $70 cheaper on MSRP at $130 MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and you are getting 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M265X is the newer 2014 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon R9 M265X make more sense than Radeon HD 5750?
Yes. Radeon R9 M265X is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $200 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon HD 5750. The trade-off is that Radeon HD 5750 currently gives you 0.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 54.1%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon HD 5750Radeon R9 M265X
1080p
low16 FPS24 FPS
medium10 FPS15 FPS
high6 FPS10 FPS
ultra3 FPS5 FPS
1440p
low11 FPS12 FPS
medium6 FPS6 FPS
high3 FPS3 FPS
ultra1 FPS2 FPS
4K
low4 FPS4 FPS
medium2 FPS3 FPS
high1 FPS1 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon HD 5750Radeon R9 M265X
1080p
low23 FPS39 FPS
medium10 FPS20 FPS
high7 FPS14 FPS
ultra5 FPS10 FPS
1440p
low7 FPS19 FPS
medium3 FPS11 FPS
high2 FPS7 FPS
ultra2 FPS5 FPS
4K
low2 FPS5 FPS
medium1 FPS3 FPS
high1 FPS3 FPS
ultra1 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon HD 5750Radeon R9 M265X
1080p
low53 FPS53 FPS
medium42 FPS42 FPS
high35 FPS35 FPS
ultra26 FPS26 FPS
1440p
low39 FPS39 FPS
medium32 FPS32 FPS
high26 FPS26 FPS
ultra20 FPS20 FPS
4K
low26 FPS26 FPS
medium21 FPS21 FPS
high18 FPS18 FPS
ultra13 FPS13 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon HD 5750Radeon R9 M265X
1080p
low53 FPS53 FPS
medium42 FPS42 FPS
high35 FPS35 FPS
ultra23 FPS26 FPS
1440p
low33 FPS9 FPS
medium24 FPS7 FPS
high18 FPS6 FPS
ultra12 FPS5 FPS
4K
low19 FPS6 FPS
medium13 FPS4 FPS
high10 FPS4 FPS
ultra7 FPS3 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5750 and Radeon R9 M265X

AMD

Radeon HD 5750

The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M265X

The Radeon R9 M265X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,167 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 5750 scores 1,169 and the Radeon R9 M265X reaches 1,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R9 M265X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 5750) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M265X). Raw compute: 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M265X).

FeatureRadeon HD 5750Radeon R9 M265X
G3D Mark Score
1,169
1,167
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
720+13%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.008 TFLOPS+26%
0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
36
40+11%
L1 Cache
72 KB
160 KB+122%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 5750Radeon R9 M265X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 5750 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M265X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M265X offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 5750Radeon R9 M265X
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 5750 draws 86W versus the Radeon R9 M265X's 75W — a 13.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M265X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 5750) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M265X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon HD 5750Radeon R9 M265X
TDP
86W
75W-13%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Perf/Watt
13.6
15.6+15%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 5750 launched at $130 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M265X launched at $200. The Radeon HD 5750 costs 35% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (Radeon HD 5750) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 M265X) — the Radeon HD 5750 offers 55.2% better value. The Radeon R9 M265X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).

FeatureRadeon HD 5750Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP
$130-35%
$200
Performance per Dollar
9.0+55%
5.8
Codename
Juniper
Venus
Release
October 13 2009
March 21 2014
Ranking
#834
#839