
Radeon HD 5750
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 5750
2009Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌207.1% higher power demand at 86W vs 28W.
Radeon HD 7750M
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 86W, a 58W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
Radeon HD 5750
2009Radeon HD 7750M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 86W, a 58W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌207.1% higher power demand at 86W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7750M better than Radeon HD 5750?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon HD 5750 make more sense than Radeon HD 7750M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 5750 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 5750 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 2 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 1 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 5750 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 5750 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5750 and Radeon HD 7750M

Radeon HD 5750
Radeon HD 5750
The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.

Radeon HD 7750M
Radeon HD 7750M
The Radeon HD 7750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5750 scores 1,169 and the Radeon HD 7750M reaches 1,191 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 7750M uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 5750) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750M). Raw compute: 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,169 | 1,191+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 720+41% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.008 TFLOPS+71% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 36+13% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 72 KB | 128 KB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5750 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750M has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 7750M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 5750) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon HD 7750M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | — | UVD3 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5750 draws 86W versus the Radeon HD 7750M's 28W — a 101.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 5750) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7750M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 86W | 28W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.6 | 42.5+213% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7750M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130 | — |
| Codename | Juniper | Chelsea |
| Release | October 13 2009 | April 24 2012 |
| Ranking | #834 | #827 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













