RADEON 9200 SE vs GeForce4 MX 420

AMD

RADEON 9200 SE

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 420

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

3

G3D Mark Score

5

Performance Difference

GeForce4 MX 420 is 66.7% faster than RADEON 9200 SE

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

RADEON 9200 SE256 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
10%
low10%
medium10%
high10%
ultra10%
1440pLimited
10%
low10%
medium10%
high10%
ultra10%
4KLimited
10%
low10%
medium10%
high10%
ultra10%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

0 GB VRAM Β· 3 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

GeForce4 MX 42064 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
5%
low5%
medium5%
high5%
ultra5%
1440pLimited
5%
low5%
medium5%
high5%
ultra5%
4KLimited
5%
low5%
medium5%
high5%
ultra5%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

0 GB VRAM Β· 5 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce4 MX 420 performs 66.7% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between RADEON 9200 SE and GeForce4 MX 420.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for RADEON 9200 SE and GeForce4 MX 420

AMD

RADEON 9200 SE

The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It includes 40 ray tracing cores. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:160
Vram:256 MB
L2 Cache:8 MB
L3 Cache:64 MB
Core Clock:1295 MHz
Boost Clock:2900 MHz
Shading Units:2560
Transistor Count:34,000 million
Ray Tracing Cores:40
Texture Fill Rate:464.0
Manufacturing Process:4 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):55 Watt
Floating Point Performance:14.85 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Strix Halo
Architecture:RDNA 3.5 (2024βˆ’2025)
Release Date:January 6 2025
Performance Ranking Position:98
NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 420

The GeForce4 MX 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:64
Vram:64 MB
Core Clock:1395 MHz
Boost Clock:1575 MHz
Shading Units:896
Transistor Count:4,700 million
Texture Fill Rate:100.8
Manufacturing Process:12 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Floating Point Performance:3.226 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Architecture:Turing (2018βˆ’2022)
Release Date:August 1 2020
Performance Ranking Position:523

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON 9200 SE and GeForce4 MX 420