
Radeon 8050S
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 8050S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅48.2% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
Radeon 8050S
2025Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅48.2% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 8050S better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 8050S | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 8050S | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 289 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 8050S | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 278 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 8050S | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 8050S and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
The Radeon 8050S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,259 points.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 8050S scores 16,259 and the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU reaches 15,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 8050S is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon 8050S) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon 8050S) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 2800 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,259+4% | 15,633 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3584 ×2+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.47 TFLOPS+7% | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz+87% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 128 | 224 ×2+75% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 8050S comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System Shared vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon 8050S) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) — the Radeon 8050S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | none | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X (Shared) | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 8050S) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8050S) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8050S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 8050S draws 55W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 138% difference. The Radeon 8050S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon 8050S) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-82% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 295.6+467% | 52.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 8050S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | — |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #126 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












