G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅+409.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌130% higher power demand at 115W vs 50W.
❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 115W, a 65W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,836 vs 19,548).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

✅+409.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 115W, a 65W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌130% higher power demand at 115W vs 50W.
❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,836 vs 19,548).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon 680M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 3,836 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon 680M is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 409.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 6nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $299 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 409.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon 680M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon 680M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Radeon 680M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon 680M
1080p
low	167 FPS	127 FPS
medium	152 FPS	113 FPS
high	134 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	70 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	111 FPS
medium	114 FPS	93 FPS
high	99 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	57 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	47 FPS
medium	74 FPS	44 FPS
high	62 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon 680M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon 680M
1080p
low	392 FPS	161 FPS
medium	334 FPS	128 FPS
high	268 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	63 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	107 FPS
medium	209 FPS	82 FPS
high	169 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	54 FPS
medium	98 FPS	43 FPS
high	82 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon 680M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon 680M
1080p
low	812 FPS	173 FPS
medium	642 FPS	138 FPS
high	551 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	129 FPS
medium	443 FPS	104 FPS
high	379 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	86 FPS
medium	297 FPS	69 FPS
high	234 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon 680M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon 680M
1080p
low	746 FPS	173 FPS
medium	613 FPS	138 FPS
high	536 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	129 FPS
medium	486 FPS	104 FPS
high	421 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	86 FPS
medium	308 FPS	69 FPS
high	285 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon 680M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon 680M

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon 680M

The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon 680M's 3,836 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 409.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (Radeon 680M) with 96 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon 680M
G3D Mark Score	19,548+410%	3,836
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	3072+300%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+347%	3.379 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+12%	2200 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	96+100%	48
L1 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24+100%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 680M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 680M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon 680M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 680M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Radeon 680M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon 680M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	272 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12_2 (Radeon 680M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon 680M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12_2
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon 680M
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	VCN 3.1
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	VCN 3.1
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 78.8% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon 680M
TDP	115W	50W-57%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	73°C	—
Perf/Watt	170.0+122%	76.7