
Quadro RTX 6000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅45.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌2158.1% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 66.3 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌57.6% higher power demand at 260W vs 165W.
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,021 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2233.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 66.3 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 260W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro RTX 6000
2018Radeon RX 7650 GRE
2025Why buy it
- ✅45.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,021 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2233.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 66.3 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 260W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌2158.1% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 66.3 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌57.6% higher power demand at 260W vs 165W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7650 GRE better than Quadro RTX 6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 805 FPS | 817 FPS |
| medium | 644 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 537 FPS | 555 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 624 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 402 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 208 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 402 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 355 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 191 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 6000 and Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.

Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Fevereiro 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2695 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,486 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 6000 scores 17,887 and the Radeon RX 7650 GRE reaches 18,486 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 6000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 22.08 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2695 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE) with 576 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,887 | 18,486+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+125% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 22.08 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2695 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+125% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+800% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+125% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7650 GRE is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 6000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 6000 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX 6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7650 GRE) — a 166.7% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7650 GRE) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+167% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 6000 draws 260W versus the Radeon RX 7650 GRE's 165W — a 44.7% difference. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 165W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 68.8 | 112.0+63% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 6000 launched at $6300 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7650 GRE launched at $279. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE costs 95.6% less ($6021 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE) — the Radeon RX 7650 GRE offers 2267.9% better value. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6300 | $279-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 66.3+2268% |
| Codename | TU102 | Navi 33 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | Fevereiro 2025 |
| Ranking | #99 | #96 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












