G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 6000

2018

Why buy it

✅125.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
687.5% HIGHER MSRP
$6,300 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 22.5 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
❌372.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 55W.

Radeon 8060S

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,500 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 692% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.5 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 55W instead of 260W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro RTX 6000

2018

Radeon 8060S

2025

Why buy it

✅125.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs Unknown).

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,500 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 692% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.5 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 55W instead of 260W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
687.5% HIGHER MSRP
$6,300 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 22.5 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
❌372.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 55W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 6000 better than Radeon 8060S?

Yes. Quadro RTX 6000 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro RTX 6000 averages 125.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 17,887 vs 17,989 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro RTX 6000 is a 2018 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 8060S is a 2025 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 8060S is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2018, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro RTX 6000 is about 687.5% more expensive on MSRP at $6,300 MSRP versus $800 MSRP, and you are getting 125.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (17,887 vs 17,989). Radeon 8060S still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Quadro RTX 6000 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon 8060S still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

When does Radeon 8060S make more sense than Quadro RTX 6000?

Yes. Radeon 8060S is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (55W vs 260W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $800 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX 6000. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX 6000 currently gives you a lower G3D Mark (17,887 vs 17,989) and 125.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon 8060S still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 6000 Benchmark Check

Radeon 8060S Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 6000	Radeon 8060S
1080p
low	205 FPS	127 FPS
medium	190 FPS	117 FPS
high	166 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	151 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	187 FPS	108 FPS
medium	158 FPS	93 FPS
high	130 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	67 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	59 FPS
medium	100 FPS	52 FPS
high	77 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	38 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 6000 Open Radeon 8060S

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 6000	Radeon 8060S
1080p
low	507 FPS	334 FPS
medium	443 FPS	270 FPS
high	344 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	289 FPS	164 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	230 FPS
medium	274 FPS	185 FPS
high	224 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	184 FPS	109 FPS
4K
low	153 FPS	94 FPS
medium	135 FPS	78 FPS
high	113 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	45 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 6000 Open Radeon 8060S

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 6000	Radeon 8060S
1080p
low	805 FPS	469 FPS
medium	644 FPS	401 FPS
high	537 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	402 FPS	282 FPS
1440p
low	604 FPS	342 FPS
medium	483 FPS	293 FPS
high	402 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	202 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	223 FPS
medium	322 FPS	184 FPS
high	268 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	112 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 6000 Open Radeon 8060S

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 6000	Radeon 8060S
1080p
low	673 FPS	308 FPS
medium	605 FPS	240 FPS
high	515 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	402 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	544 FPS	234 FPS
medium	483 FPS	189 FPS
high	402 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	131 FPS
4K
low	355 FPS	136 FPS
medium	322 FPS	117 FPS
high	268 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	79 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 6000 Open Radeon 8060S

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 6000 and Radeon 8060S

Quadro RTX 6000

The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.

Radeon 8060S

The Radeon 8060S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,989 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 6000 scores 17,887 and the Radeon 8060S reaches 17,989 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 6000 is built on Turing while the Radeon 8060S uses RDNA 3.5, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 2,560 (Radeon 8060S). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (Radeon 8060S). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 40 (Radeon 8060S) with 576 Tensor cores.

Feature	Quadro RTX 6000	Radeon 8060S
G3D Mark Score	17,887	17,989
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	4608+80%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.31 TFLOPS+10%	14.85 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1770 MHz	2900 MHz+64%
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	288+80%	160
L2 Cache	6 MB	8 MB+33%
Ray Tracing Cores	72+80%	40

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The Quadro RTX 6000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 8060S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 6000	Radeon 8060S
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 6000 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 8060S has 0 MB. The Quadro RTX 6000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 256 GB/s (Max) (Radeon 8060S) — a 200% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs System Shared. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 8 MB (Radeon 8060S) — the Radeon 8060S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 6000	Radeon 8060S
VRAM Capacity	24 GB	none
Memory Type	GDDR6	LPDDR5X (Shared)
Memory Bandwidth	768 GB/s+200%	256 GB/s (Max)
Bus Width	384-bit	System Shared
L2 Cache	6 MB	8 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon 8060S). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 6000	Radeon 8060S
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8060S). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8060S).

Feature	Quadro RTX 6000	Radeon 8060S
Encoder	NVENC 7.0	VCN 4.5
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP10	VCN 4.5
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 6000 draws 260W versus the Radeon 8060S's 55W — a 130.2% difference. The Radeon 8060S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 650W (Radeon 8060S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 6000	Radeon 8060S
TDP	260W	55W-79%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	68.8	327.1+375%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro RTX 6000 launched at $6300 MSRP, while the Radeon 8060S launched at $800. The Radeon 8060S costs 87.3% less ($5500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 22.5 (Radeon 8060S) — the Radeon 8060S offers 703.6% better value. The Radeon 8060S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).