
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅52.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 180.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌15% higher power demand at 115W vs 100W.
Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 115W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌67.2% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅52.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 180.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 115W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌15% higher power demand at 115W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌67.2% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro P5200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 289 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 124 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 77 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro P5200

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro P5200's 11,650 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 67.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1746 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+68% | 11,650 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+69% | 8.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+41% | 1746 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 160+67% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+219% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 14% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 100W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-14% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+46% | 116.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 40.2% less ($201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 23.3 (Quadro P5200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 180.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-40% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+181% | 23.3 |
| Codename | AD107 | GP104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #84 | #230 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












