
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro M6000 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+21.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $4,650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1639.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,625 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1332.4% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅+21.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $4,650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1639.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,625 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1332.4% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Quadro M6000 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M6000 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro M6000 24GB

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro M6000 24GB
Quadro M6000 24GB
The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 11,625 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 21.4%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+21% | 11,625 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3072+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 6.844 TFLOPS+6% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+51% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 120 | 256+113% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+73% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M6000 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+6% | 317 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-36% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+90% | 46.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 93% less ($4650 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1656.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-93% | $4999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1657% | 2.3 |
| Codename | TU106 | GM200 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | March 5 2016 |
| Ranking | #168 | #233 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













