Quadro M4000M vs Quadro P3000

NVIDIA

Quadro M4000M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P3000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

6148

G3D Mark Score

6384

Performance Difference

Quadro P3000 is 3.8% faster than Quadro M4000M

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro M4000M4096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
22%
low75%
medium42%
high14%
ultra4%
1440pLow
10%
low42%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 6,148 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Quadro P30006144 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
32%
low84%
medium62%
high22%
ultra12%
1440pLow
17%
low62%
medium22%
high12%
ultra6%
4KLimited
9%
low22%
medium12%
high6%
ultra6%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

6 GB VRAM Β· 6,384 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro P3000 performs 3.8% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3000.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3000

NVIDIA

Quadro M4000M

The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:80
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:480 kB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:975 MHz
Boost Clock:1013 MHz
Shading Units:1,280
Transistor Count:5,200 million
Texture Fill Rate:78.00
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):100 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.496 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM204
Architecture:Maxwell 2.0 (2014βˆ’2019)
Release Date:August 18 2015
Performance Ranking Position:392
NVIDIA

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:96
TMUs:240
Vram:6144 MB
L1 Cache:1.4 MB
L2 Cache:3 MB
Core Clock:1506 MHz
Boost Clock:1645 MHz
Shading Units:3840
Transistor Count:11,800 million
Texture Fill Rate:394.8
Manufacturing Process:16 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):250 Watt
Floating Point Performance:12.63 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GP102
Architecture:Pascal (2016βˆ’2021)
Launch Price:$5,999
Release Date:October 1 2016
Performance Ranking Position:141

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3000