Quadro M2200 vs Quadro K4200

NVIDIA

Quadro M2200

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K4200

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

4294

G3D Mark Score

4332

Performance Difference

Quadro K4200 is 0.9% faster than Quadro M2200

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro M22004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
13%
low60%
medium20%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
7%
low30%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 4,294 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Quadro K42004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
13%
low60%
medium20%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
7%
low30%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 4,332 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro K4200 performs 0.9% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro M2200 and Quadro K4200.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro M2200 and Quadro K4200

NVIDIA

Quadro M2200

The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:64
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:384 kB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
Core Clock:695 MHz
Boost Clock:1036 MHz
Shading Units:1024
Transistor Count:2,940 million
Texture Fill Rate:66.30
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):55 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.122 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM206
Architecture:Maxwell 2.0 (2014βˆ’2019)
Release Date:January 11 2017
Performance Ranking Position:479
NVIDIA

Quadro K4200

The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:112
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:112 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:771 MHz
Boost Clock:784 MHz
Shading Units:1344
Transistor Count:3,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:87.81
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):108 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.107 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK104
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$854.99
Release Date:July 22 2014
Performance Ranking Position:475

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M2200 and Quadro K4200