Quadro M2000M vs GRID K520

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

3410

G3D Mark Score

3516

Performance Difference

GRID K520 is 3.1% faster than Quadro M2000M

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro M2000M4096 MB

016GB32GB

1080pLow

13%

low60%

medium20%

high4%

ultra4%

1440pLimited

low20%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

4KLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

📊 Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM · 3,410 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.

1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

GRID K520N/A

016GB32GB

VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GRID K520 performs 3.1% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro M2000M and GRID K520.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro M2000M and GRID K520

Quadro M2000M

The Quadro M2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,410 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16

TMUs:40

Vram:4096 MB

L1 Cache:320 kB

L2 Cache:2 MB

Core Clock:1029 MHz

Boost Clock:1098 MHz

Shading Units:640

Transistor Count:1,870 million

Texture Fill Rate:43.92

Manufacturing Process:28 nm

Power Consumption (TDP):55 Watt

Floating Point Performance:1.405 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM107

Architecture:Maxwell (2014−2017)

Release Date:December 3 2015

Performance Ranking Position:550

GRID K520

The GRID K520 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,516 points. Launch price was $3,599.