Quadro K6000 vs FirePro W9100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

7993

G3D Mark Score

7748

Performance Difference

Quadro K6000 is 3.2% faster than FirePro W9100

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro K600012288 MB

016GB32GB

1080pMedium

52%

low86%

medium71%

high49%

ultra35%

1440pLow

39%

low71%

medium49%

high35%

ultra28%

4KLow

25%

low49%

medium35%

high28%

ultra11%

📊 Performance Analysis

12 GB VRAM · 7,993 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.

1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.

4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Quality mode: +30-40% FPS. Frame Gen available on RTX 40 series.

FirePro W910016384 MB

016GB32GB

1080pMedium

53%

low86%

medium71%

high49%

ultra39%

1440pLow

43%

low71%

medium49%

high39%

ultra35%

4KLow

34%

low49%

medium39%

high35%

ultra28%

📊 Performance Analysis

16 GB VRAM · 7,748 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.

1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.

4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Quality mode: +30-40% FPS. Frame Gen available on RTX 40 series.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro K6000 performs 3.2% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro K6000 and FirePro W9100.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro K6000 and FirePro W9100

Quadro K6000

The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48

TMUs:240

Vram:12288 MB

L1 Cache:240 kB

L2 Cache:1536 kB

Core Clock:797 MHz

Boost Clock:902 MHz

Shading Units:2880

Transistor Count:7,080 million

Texture Fill Rate:216.5

Manufacturing Process:28 nm

Power Consumption (TDP):225 Watt

Floating Point Performance:5.196 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK110B

Architecture:Kepler (2012−2018)

Launch Price:$5,265

Release Date:July 23 2013

Performance Ranking Position:318

FirePro W9100

The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.