Quadro K4200 vs FirePro W7000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

4332

G3D Mark Score

4304

Performance Difference

Quadro K4200 is 0.7% faster than FirePro W7000

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro K42004096 MB

016GB32GB

1080pLow

13%

low60%

medium20%

high4%

ultra4%

1440pLimited

low30%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

4KLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

📊 Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM · 4,332 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.

1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

FirePro W70004096 MB

016GB32GB

1080pLow

13%

low60%

medium20%

high4%

ultra4%

1440pLimited

low30%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

4KLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

📊 Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM · 4,304 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.

1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro K4200 performs 0.7% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro K4200 and FirePro W7000.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro K4200 and FirePro W7000

Quadro K4200

The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32

TMUs:112

Vram:4096 MB

L1 Cache:112 kB

L2 Cache:512 kB

Core Clock:771 MHz

Boost Clock:784 MHz

Shading Units:1344

Transistor Count:3,540 million

Texture Fill Rate:87.81

Manufacturing Process:28 nm

Power Consumption (TDP):108 Watt

Floating Point Performance:2.107 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK104

Architecture:Kepler (2012−2018)

Launch Price:$854.99

Release Date:July 22 2014

Performance Ranking Position:475

FirePro W7000

The FirePro W7000 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,304 points. Launch price was $899.