
Quadro GP100
Popular choices:

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌600% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌42.4% higher power demand at 235W vs 165W.
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅3.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $6,000 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 614.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 235W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro GP100
2016RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅3.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $6,000 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 614.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 235W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌600% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌42.4% higher power demand at 235W vs 165W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is RadeonT RX 6850M XT better than Quadro GP100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro GP100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 337 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 157 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro GP100 and RadeonT RX 6850M XT

Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 and the RadeonT RX 6850M XT reaches 13,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,710 | 13,992+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.34 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 2581 MHz+79% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+40% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+160% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GP100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT has 12 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro GP100) vs 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+3100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 165W — a 35% difference. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W | 165W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 58.3 | 84.8+45% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro GP100 launched at $7000 MSRP, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT costs 85.7% less ($6000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro GP100) vs 14.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers 600% better value. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7000 | $1000-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 14.0+600% |
| Codename | GP100 | Navi 22 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #178 | #103 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













