Quadro FX 3000 vs RADEON X700

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

RADEON X700

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

69

G3D Mark Score

73

Performance Difference

RADEON X700 is 5.8% faster than Quadro FX 3000

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro FX 3000256 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

0 GB VRAM Β· 69 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

RADEON X700256 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
7%
low7%
medium7%
high7%
ultra7%
1440pLimited
7%
low7%
medium7%
high7%
ultra7%
4KLimited
7%
low7%
medium7%
high7%
ultra7%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

0 GB VRAM Β· 73 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, RADEON X700 performs 5.8% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro FX 3000 and RADEON X700.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro FX 3000 and RADEON X700

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3000

The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:256 MB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:610 MHz
Shading Units:240
Transistor Count:1,400 million
Texture Fill Rate:48.80
Manufacturing Process:55 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):189 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.6221 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GT200B
Architecture:Tesla 2.0 (2007βˆ’2013)
Launch Price:$3,499
Release Date:November 11 2008
Performance Ranking Position:815
AMD

RADEON X700

The RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It includes 36 ray tracing cores. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:144
Vram:256 MB
L0 Cache:576 kB
L1 Cache:512 kB
L2 Cache:3 MB
L3 Cache:80 MB
Core Clock:1941 MHz
Boost Clock:2450 MHz
Shading Units:2304
Transistor Count:17,200 million
Ray Tracing Cores:36
Texture Fill Rate:352.8
Manufacturing Process:7 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):175 Watt
Floating Point Performance:11.29 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Navi 22
Architecture:RDNA 2.0 (2020βˆ’2025)
Release Date:June 9 2021
Performance Ranking Position:90

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 3000 and RADEON X700