Quadro FX 2700M vs Intel UHD Graphics 605

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2700M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 605

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

367

G3D Mark Score

364

Performance Difference

Quadro FX 2700M is 0.8% faster than Intel UHD Graphics 605

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro FX 2700M512 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM Β· 367 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Intel UHD Graphics 605N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro FX 2700M performs 0.8% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro FX 2700M and Intel UHD Graphics 605.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro FX 2700M and Intel UHD Graphics 605

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2700M

The Quadro FX 2700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 367 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:512 MB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:610 MHz
Shading Units:240
Transistor Count:1,400 million
Texture Fill Rate:48.80
Manufacturing Process:55 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):189 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.6221 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GT200B
Architecture:Tesla 2.0 (2007βˆ’2013)
Launch Price:$3,499
Release Date:November 11 2008
Performance Ranking Position:815
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 605

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 364 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:3
TMUs:23
Vram:null
Core Clock:350 MHz
Boost Clock:1150 MHz
Shading Units:184
Transistor Count:189 million
Texture Fill Rate:26.45
Manufacturing Process:14 nm+++
Power Consumption (TDP):15 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.4232 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Comet Lake GT2
Architecture:Generation 9.5 (2016βˆ’2020)
Release Date:October 1 2017
Performance Ranking Position:824

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 2700M and Intel UHD Graphics 605