Quadro FX 1600M vs RADEON HD7450

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1600M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

RADEON HD7450

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

195

G3D Mark Score

199

Performance Difference

RADEON HD7450 is 2.1% faster than Quadro FX 1600M

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro FX 1600M512 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM Β· 195 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

RADEON HD7450N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, RADEON HD7450 performs 2.1% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro FX 1600M and RADEON HD7450.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro FX 1600M and RADEON HD7450

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1600M

The Quadro FX 1600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 195 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:512 MB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:610 MHz
Shading Units:240
Transistor Count:1,400 million
Texture Fill Rate:48.80
Manufacturing Process:55 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):189 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.6221 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GT200B
Architecture:Tesla 2.0 (2007βˆ’2013)
Launch Price:$3,499
Release Date:November 11 2008
Performance Ranking Position:815
AMD

RADEON HD7450

The RADEON HD7450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Boost clock: 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 199 points. Launch price was $449.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:112
Vram:null
L1 Cache:448 kB
L2 Cache:768 kB
Boost Clock:1250 MHz
Shading Units:1792
Transistor Count:4,313 million
Texture Fill Rate:89.60
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):200 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.867 TFLOPS
Quantidade De Transportadores Compute:28

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Tahiti
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$449
Release Date:January 31 2012
Performance Ranking Position:454

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 1600M and RADEON HD7450