Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 3300

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1400

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3300

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

124

G3D Mark Score

127

Performance Difference

Radeon HD 3300 is 2.4% faster than Quadro FX 1400

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro FX 1400128 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

0 GB VRAM Β· 124 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon HD 3300N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon HD 3300 performs 2.4% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro FX 1400 and Radeon HD 3300.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro FX 1400 and Radeon HD 3300

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1400

The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:24
TMUs:64
Vram:128 MB
L2 Cache:192 kB
Core Clock:602 MHz
Shading Units:192
Transistor Count:1,400 million
Texture Fill Rate:38.53
Manufacturing Process:55 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):150 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.4623 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GT200B
Architecture:Tesla 2.0 (2007βˆ’2013)
Launch Price:$1,799
Release Date:November 11 2008
Performance Ranking Position:884
AMD

Radeon HD 3300

The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. Core clock: 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:null
L1 Cache:320 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:750 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:2,640 million
Texture Fill Rate:60.00
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):186 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.92 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Cayman
Architecture:TeraScale 3 (2010βˆ’2013)
Launch Price:$180
Release Date:December 1 2011
Performance Ranking Position:598

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 1400 and Radeon HD 3300