Quadro 2000 D vs Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 4000M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

1239

G3D Mark Score

1287

Performance Difference

Quadro 4000M is 3.9% faster than Quadro 2000 D

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro 2000 DN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Quadro 4000M2048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 1,287 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro 4000M performs 3.9% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro 2000 D and Quadro 4000M.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro 2000 D and Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. Core clock: 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:null
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:625 MHz
Shading Units:192
Transistor Count:1,170 million
Texture Fill Rate:20.00
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):62 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.48 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF106
Architecture:Fermi (2010βˆ’2014)
Launch Price:$599
Release Date:October 5 2011
Performance Ranking Position:892
NVIDIA

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. Core clock: 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:56
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:448 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:475 MHz
Shading Units:336
Transistor Count:1,950 million
Texture Fill Rate:26.60
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):100 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.6384 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF104
Architecture:Fermi (2010βˆ’2014)
Launch Price:$449
Release Date:February 22 2011
Performance Ranking Position:801

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000 D and Quadro 4000M