Quadro 1000M vs Radeon R7 M265

NVIDIA

Quadro 1000M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M265

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

555

G3D Mark Score

560

Performance Difference

Radeon R7 M265 is 0.9% faster than Quadro 1000M

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro 1000M2048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 555 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon R7 M2654096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
8%
low27%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
5%
low10%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 560 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon R7 M265 performs 0.9% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro 1000M and Radeon R7 M265.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro 1000M and Radeon R7 M265

NVIDIA

Quadro 1000M

The Quadro 1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $200.89.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:993 MHz
Boost Clock:1072 MHz
Shading Units:512
Transistor Count:1,870 million
Texture Fill Rate:31.78
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):40 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.017 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM107
Architecture:Maxwell (2014βˆ’2017)
Launch Price:$200.89
Release Date:August 18 2015
Performance Ranking Position:594
AMD

Radeon R7 M265

The Radeon R7 M265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Boost clock: 925 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 560 points. Launch price was $149.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:64
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Boost Clock:925 MHz
Shading Units:1024
Transistor Count:2,800 million
Texture Fill Rate:59.20
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):150 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.894 TFLOPS

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Pitcairn
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$149
Release Date:February 13 2014
Performance Ranking Position:489

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 1000M and Radeon R7 M265