
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅15.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 35.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
2022Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅15.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 35.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU better than Intel Arc Pro B50?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro B50 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 10 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 21 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 410 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 273 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 137 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 398 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 137 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU and Intel Arc Pro B50

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,144 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel Arc Pro B50
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU scores 12,144 and the Intel Arc Pro B50 reaches 12,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro B50) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,144 | 12,208 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS | 10.65 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2600 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro B50 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU draws 130W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 60% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 70W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 167mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | 75°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 93.4 | 174.4+87% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $349 |
| Codename | GA106 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #211 | #221 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













