
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 4600G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +68.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 10.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $154 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.6% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$154 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 4600G.
Ryzen 5 4600G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $175 less on MSRP ($154 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,985 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 103.8 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($154 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 5 4600G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +68.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 10.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $154 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $175 less on MSRP ($154 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.6% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$154 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 4600G.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,985 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 103.8 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($154 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 5 4600G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 157 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 232 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 338 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 5 4600G

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 5 4600G
Ryzen 5 4600G
The Ryzen 5 4600G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,985 points. Launch price was $154.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 4600G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600G — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600G uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 5 4600G's 15,985 — a 80.8% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600G.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+21% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+200% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 37,655+136% | 15,985 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,348 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,578 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,619 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 4600G — the Core i5-13600K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 4600G) — the Ryzen 5 4600G offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and B450,X470,B550,X570,A520 (Ryzen 5 4600G).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 4600G). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Radeon Vega 7 (Ryzen 5 4600G) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen 5 4600G targets Entry Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 4600G rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Vega 7 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Entry Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 4600G debuted at $154. On MSRP ($329 vs $154), the Ryzen 5 4600G is $175 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 103.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 4600G — making the Core i5-13600K the 9.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $154-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+10% | 103.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












