
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core i7-14700T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 82.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-14700T.
Core i7-14700T
2024Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,604 vs 37,655).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 82.3 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Core i5-13600K
2022Core i7-14700T
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 82.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-14700T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,604 vs 37,655).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 82.3 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core i7-14700T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 133 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 528 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 790 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 790 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 717 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 644 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 688 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 592 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core i7-14700T

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core i7-14700T
Core i7-14700T
The Core i7-14700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,604 points. Launch price was $384.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-14700T offers 20 cores / 28 threads — the Core i7-14700T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-14700T — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700T (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-14700T uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core i7-14700T's 31,604 — a 17.5% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700T.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 20 / 28+43% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+169% | 1.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 33 MB (total)+38% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 37,655+19% | 31,604 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,723 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,390 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and Z790,B760,H770,Z690,B660,H610 (Core i7-14700T).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14700T). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and UHD 770 (Core i7-14700T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Core i7-14700T targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-14700T rivals Ryzen 7 7700.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Productivity |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Core i7-14700T debuted at $384. On MSRP ($329 vs $384), the Core i5-13600K is $55 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 82.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-14700T — making the Core i5-13600K the 32.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-14% | $384 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+39% | 82.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













