
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

EPYC 7742
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6,776 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1023.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 69,448).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7742, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7742
2019Why buy it
- ✅+255.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+1322.2% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($6,950 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022EPYC 7742
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6,776 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1023.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+255.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+1322.2% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 69,448).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7742, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($6,950 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than EPYC 7742?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 7742 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 7742 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 84 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 7742 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 415 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 224 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 7742 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 906 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 828 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 713 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 618 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 711 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 623 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 534 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 454 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 346 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and EPYC 7742

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

EPYC 7742
EPYC 7742
The EPYC 7742 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,448 points. Launch price was $6,950.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 7742 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7742 has 58 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7742 — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.25 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7742 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the EPYC 7742's 69,448 — a 112.2% lead for the EPYC 7742. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7742.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 7742 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 64 / 128+967% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+29% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+11% | 2.25 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+1322% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 69,448+256% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7742 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus 3200 on the EPYC 7742 — the EPYC 7742 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7742 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 8 (EPYC 7742). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 128 (EPYC 7742) — the EPYC 7742 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and SP3 (EPYC 7742).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 7742 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3276700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7742). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; EPYC 7742 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 7742 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the EPYC 7742 debuted at $6950. On MSRP ($174 vs $6950), the Core i5-12400F is $6776 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 10.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 7742 — making the Core i5-12400F the 167.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 7742 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-97% | $6950 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+1023% | 10.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












