Core i5-12400F vs Xeon W-1350P

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon W-1350P

6 Cores12 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2021

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Costs $137 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
  • Delivers 78.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 63.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 19,611).

Xeon W-1350P

2021

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($311 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
  • 92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Xeon W-1350P?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-1350P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-12400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1350P is the better fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-12400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-12400F is $137 cheaper on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $311 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon W-1350P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 78.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 63.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12400FXeon W-1350P
1080p
low183 FPS261 FPS
medium168 FPS239 FPS
high139 FPS199 FPS
ultra119 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS227 FPS
medium132 FPS189 FPS
high106 FPS153 FPS
ultra89 FPS134 FPS
4K
low87 FPS156 FPS
medium81 FPS130 FPS
high64 FPS100 FPS
ultra49 FPS88 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12400FXeon W-1350P
1080p
low471 FPS325 FPS
medium397 FPS274 FPS
high341 FPS250 FPS
ultra301 FPS225 FPS
1440p
low407 FPS289 FPS
medium351 FPS245 FPS
high309 FPS225 FPS
ultra265 FPS201 FPS
4K
low282 FPS226 FPS
medium248 FPS194 FPS
high229 FPS182 FPS
ultra196 FPS148 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12400FXeon W-1350P
1080p
low488 FPS490 FPS
medium488 FPS490 FPS
high488 FPS449 FPS
ultra488 FPS388 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS490 FPS
medium488 FPS475 FPS
high485 FPS403 FPS
ultra434 FPS351 FPS
4K
low442 FPS391 FPS
medium389 FPS345 FPS
high337 FPS302 FPS
ultra274 FPS252 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12400FXeon W-1350P
1080p
low488 FPS490 FPS
medium488 FPS490 FPS
high488 FPS490 FPS
ultra488 FPS490 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS490 FPS
medium488 FPS490 FPS
high488 FPS490 FPS
ultra473 FPS490 FPS
4K
low488 FPS490 FPS
medium450 FPS490 FPS
high391 FPS490 FPS
ultra330 FPS437 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Xeon W-1350P

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Intel

Xeon W-1350P

The Xeon W-1350P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,611 points. Launch price was $311.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-12400F and Xeon W-1350P share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1350P — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-1350P uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon W-1350P's 19,611 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon W-1350P. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350P.

FeatureCore i5-12400FXeon W-1350P
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
4 GHz+60%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+50%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark
19,532
19,611
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1350P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12400FXeon W-1350P
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Xeon W-1350P). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FXeon W-1350P
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1350P debuted at $311. On MSRP ($174 vs $311), the Core i5-12400F is $137 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 63.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1350P — making the Core i5-12400F the 56.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-12400FXeon W-1350P
MSRP
$174-44%
$311
Performance per Dollar
112.3+78%
63.1
Release Date
2022
2021