
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 104.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 19.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 285W instead of 575W, a 290W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5090 across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (264 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 5090
2025Why buy it
- ✅9.6% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅157.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 264).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌150.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌101.8% higher power demand at 575W vs 285W.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024GeForce RTX 5090
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 104.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 19.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 285W instead of 575W, a 290W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅9.6% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅157.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 264).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5090 across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (264 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌150.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌101.8% higher power demand at 575W vs 285W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5090 better than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 880 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 263 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 944 FPS |
| medium | 999 FPS | 772 FPS |
| high | 955 FPS | 698 FPS |
| ultra | 716 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 976 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 859 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 716 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 537 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 962 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 817 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 907 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 811 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 753 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 630 FPS | 778 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 438 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and GeForce RTX 5090

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.

GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090
The GeForce RTX 5090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,867 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 31,828 versus the GeForce RTX 5090's 38,867 — the GeForce RTX 5090 leads by 22.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 5090 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090). Raw compute: 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 66 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 170 (GeForce RTX 5090) with 264 Tensor cores vs 680.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,828 | 38,867+22% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8448 | 21760+158% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 44.1 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS+138% |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+8% | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 176+83% |
| TMUs | 264 | 680+158% |
| L1 Cache | 8.3 MB | 21.3 MB+157% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 66 | 170+158% |
| Tensor Cores | 264 | 680+158% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the GeForce RTX 5090 is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The GeForce RTX 5090 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5090 has 32 GB. The GeForce RTX 5090 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 1792 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5090) — a 166.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090. Bus width: 256-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090) — the GeForce RTX 5090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 1792 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5090). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 5090). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5090).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER draws 285W versus the GeForce RTX 5090's 575W — a 67.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 310mm vs 304mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W-50% | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W-25% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 310mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 111.7+65% | 67.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 5090 launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER costs 60% less ($1200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 19.4 (GeForce RTX 5090) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 105.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 5090 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-60% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.8+105% | 19.4 |
| Codename | AD103 | GB202 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #10 | #3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












