
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
2025Why buy it
- ✅11.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (32,587 vs 35,929).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (280 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌215.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 95W.
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅+10.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅17.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 280).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 300W, a 205W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5070 Ti across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
2025RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅11.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅+10.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅17.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 280).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 300W, a 205W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (32,587 vs 35,929).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (280 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌215.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 95W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5070 Ti across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5070 Ti better than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 583 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 126 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 939 FPS | 877 FPS |
| medium | 757 FPS | 730 FPS |
| high | 670 FPS | 656 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 503 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 393 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 889 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 769 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 680 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 697 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 592 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 486 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 97 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2295 MHz to 2452 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,587 points. Launch price was $749.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 990 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,929 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 32,587 versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile's 35,929 — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile leads by 10.3%. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 8,960 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 10,496 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 43.94 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 35.27 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 2452 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 82 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) with 280 Tensor cores vs 328.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 32,587 | 35,929+10% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8960 | 10496+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 43.94 TFLOPS+25% | 35.27 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2452 MHz+46% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 112+17% |
| TMUs | 280 | 328+17% |
| L1 Cache | 8.8 MB | 10.3 MB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 64 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70 | 82+17% |
| Tensor Cores | 280 | 328+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 896 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) — a 14.3% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 64 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 896 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 64 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs NVENC (Blackwell) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs NVDEC (Blackwell). Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | NVENC (Blackwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | NVDEC (Blackwell) |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti draws 300W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile's 95W — a 103.8% difference. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 88 C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 95W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 88 C | 85-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.6 | 378.2+248% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












