
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,250 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 883.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.5 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (280 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅7.8% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅57.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 280).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌834.4% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 43.5 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
2025RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,250 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 883.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.5 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅7.8% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅57.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 280).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (280 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌834.4% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 43.5 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5070 Ti better than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 583 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 199 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 939 FPS | 931 FPS |
| medium | 757 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 670 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 503 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 889 FPS | 963 FPS |
| medium | 769 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 680 FPS | 774 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 697 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 697 FPS | 748 FPS |
| medium | 592 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 520 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 486 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2295 MHz to 2452 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,587 points. Launch price was $749.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 2377 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,968 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 32,587 versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 30,968 — the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti leads by 5.2%. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 8,960 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 14,080 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 43.94 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 66.94 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2452 MHz vs 2377 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 110 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) with 280 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 32,587+5% | 30,968 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8960 | 14080+57% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 43.94 TFLOPS | 66.94 TFLOPS+52% |
| Boost Clock | 2452 MHz+3% | 2377 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 176+83% |
| TMUs | 280 | 440+57% |
| L1 Cache | 8.8 MB | 13.8 MB+57% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70 | 110+57% |
| Tensor Cores | 280 | 440+57% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 896 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — a 14.3% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 96 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 48 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 896 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti draws 300W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 300W — a 0% difference. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 88 C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 88 C | 75-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.6+5% | 103.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti launched at $749 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell launched at $6999. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti costs 89.3% less ($6250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.5 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 4.4 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti offers 888.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $749-89% | $6999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.5+889% | 4.4 |
| Codename | GB203 | GB202 |
| Release | February 20 2025 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #9 | #13 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












