
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 160W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 136), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅25.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅41.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (136 vs 96).
Trade-offs
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌39.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 160W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅25.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅41.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (136 vs 96).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 136), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌39.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 255 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 255 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 15.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 96 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 22,651+16% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4352+42% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+46% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz | 2535 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 136+42% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 4.3 MB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 34+42% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 136+42% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 5.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 288 GB/s+6% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 32.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-28% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | 70°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+20% | 141.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 25.1% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 15.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-25% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+15% | 56.8 |
| Codename | AD107 | AD106 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #84 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












