
GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020Why buy it
- ✅37.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅141.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 136).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌118.8% higher power demand at 350W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 350W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3090
2020GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅37.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅141.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 136).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 350W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌118.8% higher power demand at 350W vs 160W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3090 better than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU make more sense than GeForce RTX 3090?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 348 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 64 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 909 FPS | 783 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 574 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 711 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 583 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 196 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 821 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 765 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 656 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 609 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 534 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 397 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 196 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 and GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3090 scores 26,594 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU's 17,400 — the GeForce RTX 3090 leads by 52.8%. The GeForce RTX 3090 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) with 328 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,594+53% | 17,400 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496+141% | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.58 TFLOPS+61% | 22.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 2535 MHz+50% |
| ROPs | 112+133% | 48 |
| TMUs | 328+141% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB+140% | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 32 MB+433% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82+141% | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 328+141% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) — a 265.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 936 GB/s+266% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 32 MB+433% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 draws 350W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU's 160W — a 74.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 160W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 312mm | — |
| Height | 140mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 108.8+43% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | — |
| Codename | GA102 | AD106 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #37 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












