
GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 100W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 100W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌50.8% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.7 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 960
2015GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 100W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 100W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌50.8% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.7 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce MX570 A better than GeForce GTX 960?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 960 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 30 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 35 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and GeForce MX570 A

GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the GeForce MX570 A reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce MX570 A uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1155 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133 | 6,208+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS+96% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+2% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2 MB+426% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) vs 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 960. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s+17% | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the GeForce MX570 A's 25W — a 120% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 350W (GeForce MX570 A). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 25W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3 | 248.3+305% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 MSRP, while the GeForce MX570 A launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 960 costs 33.7% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) — the GeForce GTX 960 offers 48.8% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-34% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8+49% | 20.7 |
| Codename | GM206 | GA107 |
| Release | January 22 2015 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #393 | #387 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













