GeForce MX350 vs Radeon R7 260

NVIDIA

GeForce MX350

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 260

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

2828

G3D Mark Score

2892

Performance Difference

Radeon R7 260 is 2.3% faster than GeForce MX350

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce MX350N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Radeon R7 2601024 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
6%
low24%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM Β· 2,892 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon R7 260 performs 2.3% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce MX350 and Radeon R7 260.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce MX350 and Radeon R7 260

NVIDIA

GeForce MX350

The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:null
L1 Cache:240 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:747 MHz
Boost Clock:937 MHz
Shading Units:640
Transistor Count:3,300 million
Texture Fill Rate:29.98
Manufacturing Process:14 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):20 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.199 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GP107
Architecture:Pascal (2016βˆ’2021)
Release Date:February 10 2020
Performance Ranking Position:597
AMD

Radeon R7 260

The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. Boost clock: 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:48
Vram:1024 MB
L1 Cache:192 kB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Boost Clock:1100 MHz
Shading Units:768
Transistor Count:2,080 million
Texture Fill Rate:48.00
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):115 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.536 TFLOPS

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Bonaire
Architecture:GCN 2.0 (2013βˆ’2017)
Launch Price:$109
Release Date:December 17 2013
Performance Ranking Position:591

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX350 and Radeon R7 260