G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 81W instead of 200W, a 119W reduction.
✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,707 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+301.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌146.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 81W.
❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

2014

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 81W instead of 200W, a 119W reduction.
✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+301.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,707 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌146.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 81W.
❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 6,707 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is a 2014 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014, 301.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $599 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 301.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	100 FPS	183 FPS
medium	85 FPS	167 FPS
high	68 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	131 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	150 FPS
medium	75 FPS	124 FPS
high	54 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	92 FPS
medium	26 FPS	78 FPS
high	17 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	58 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE Open GeForce RTX 4070

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	166 FPS	544 FPS
medium	135 FPS	454 FPS
high	108 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	113 FPS	351 FPS
medium	86 FPS	288 FPS
high	68 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	48 FPS	172 FPS
medium	39 FPS	144 FPS
high	35 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	101 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE Open GeForce RTX 4070

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	302 FPS	884 FPS
medium	241 FPS	713 FPS
high	201 FPS	643 FPS
ultra	151 FPS	569 FPS
1440p
low	226 FPS	684 FPS
medium	181 FPS	549 FPS
high	151 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	424 FPS
4K
low	151 FPS	467 FPS
medium	121 FPS	373 FPS
high	101 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	277 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE Open GeForce RTX 4070

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	167 FPS	751 FPS
medium	137 FPS	612 FPS
high	123 FPS	536 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	497 FPS
1440p
low	117 FPS	615 FPS
medium	98 FPS	500 FPS
high	88 FPS	433 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	395 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	384 FPS
medium	54 FPS	324 FPS
high	44 FPS	301 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	272 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE Open GeForce RTX 4070

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE scores 6,707 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 301.4%. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2475 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score	6,707	26,919+301%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1280	5888+360%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.657 TFLOPS	29.15 TFLOPS+997%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	2475 MHz+138%
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	80	184+130%
L1 Cache	0.47 MB	5.8 MB+1134%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	36 MB+2300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 120 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 320% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	12 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	120 GB/s	504 GB/s+320%
Bus Width	192-bit	192-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	36 MB+2300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder	5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	1st Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE draws 81W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 84.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 4070
TDP	81W-60%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W-46%	650W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	8-pin
Length	267mm	304mm
Height	111mm	137mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	82.8	134.6+63%